If two officers disagree on event location, what is appropriate EO action?

• A. Let the treasurer decide unilaterally.
• B. Facilitate structured discussion, gather input, and make a decision that aligns with chapter goals and policies, possibly a vote if required.
• C. Cancel the event.
• D. Postpone until all agree.

Answer: (B)

When two officers disagree on where an event should be held, the appropriate action is to guide a structured, policy-driven decision-making process. Begin by bringing the involved officers together with the adviser, establish a clear agenda, and set ground rules for respectful discussion. Gather input from other officers as needed and consider factors like budget, venue availability, accessibility, safety, timing, and how the choice supports the chapter’s goals and policies.

Evaluate options against those policies, discuss the advantages and trade-offs of each location, and seek common ground or a workable compromise. If the chapter’s rules call for a democratic decision, proceed with a vote and ensure the process is transparent and well-documented. After a decision is reached, communicate it clearly to the chapter and assign tasks to implement it.

Using this approach keeps the decision aligned with chapter aims, maintains leadership integrity, and resolves disagreements efficiently. Relying on a single officer to decide unilaterally bypasses governance processes, while canceling or postponing indefinitely ignores practical needs and can disrupt plans.